CAS 3.1 Release

[Bill Bailey]

It seems I must apologize. I have searched my old emails once again and
I did find where Scott replied to my earlier question about 3.1. Sorry
bout that, Scott. In that email, he indicated that they were targeting
the end of June so it seems the old date of June 15th for the final
release may no longer hold. But he did say that a RC should contain the
single sign-off feature and I can only hope that if the final release
will be available at the end of June, the RC might be available a few
weeks before that.

Hope this helps some.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu [mailto:cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu]
On Behalf Of Dusty Burwell
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:32 PM
To: cas at tp.its.yale.edu
Subject: Re: CAS 3.1 Release

Bill Bailey <Bill.Bailey at ...> writes:

> 
> I am in a similar situation except I am only beginning development. I
> have started working with 3.0.7 and was under the impression I might
> have to develop my own version of single sign-out, but I would ideally
> like to work with the standard version if it is available in time. I
> asked the question some time ago when this would be available and I
> don't think I ever got any response. I would also be interested in the
> answer to this question.
> 
> Bill Bailey
> Senior Developer / DBA
> Northland, A Church Distributed
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cas-bounces at ... [mailto:cas-bounces at ...]
> On Behalf Of Dusty Burwell
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 10:37 AM
> To: cas at ...
> Subject: CAS 3.1 Release
> 
> I was wondering if CAS 3.1 was sticking to the roadmap shown here:
> 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CAS/CAS+3.1+Roadmap
> 
> I've got a project that's using CAS 3.0.7 right now with some
> extensions that I made to implement some semblance of single sign out.
>  But, I'd rather use the standard single sign out provided in version
> 3.1 (through SAML?) if possible.
> 
> Even if 3.1 doesn't make the final release date of June 15, if there's
> at least a milestone release with the single sign out capabilities
> released by then, I'll have time to work with it.  If not, then I'll
> need to continue with my current implementation (for the time being at
> least).
> 

Bill,

If it so happens that 3.1 will not be released in time to work with your
schedule, I'd be glad to share what I have done for single sign out.
It's by
far not the most robust implementation and may not work in all cases
(I'm not
sure how well it works for proxy authentication for instance), but it
may be
enough to suit your needs for the time being or, at least, a good
jumping off
point.

Dusty Burwell
Application Developer
Kansas State University

_______________________________________________
Yale CAS mailing list
cas at tp.its.yale.edu
http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas