Using a different LDAP attribute for the principal ID for Google Apps SAML only?
Brodie Rao
brodie.rao at cpcc.edu
Thu Jul 31 16:01:21 EDT 2008
I'm trying out the clustering idea with 3.3-RC2 and memcached, but I've
run into one snag: the two servlets aren't sharing cookies. The cookie
path is being set to the servlet path, despite p:cookiePath being set to
"/" in TG and warn cookie generators.
I have emptySessionPath set in Tomcat, so the JSESSIONID cookies are
being shared, just not CASTGC/WARN. Reading up on Tomcat it looks like
it prepends the servlet path by design. Is there any way to get around this?
Scott Battaglia wrote:
> 3.3 shouldn't have any major configuration changes from 3.2 so it should
> be an easy upgrade. We're hoping to release 3.3 soon as "final" I'm
> just waiting to hear back if anyone has any problems since I haven't had
> time to do my own testing yet.
>
> -Scott
>
> -Scott Battaglia
> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Lucas Rockwell <lr at berkeley.edu
> <mailto:lr at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> Thanks! I will just try it with 3.3 if possible for what I am doing.
>
> -lucas
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Scott Battaglia wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I haven't tried it. 3.2 has an AtomicBoolean in one
>> of the Tickets which can't be used in Terracotta. 3.3 changes
>> that (hence the version switch).
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> -Scott Battaglia
>> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Lucas Rockwell <lr at berkeley.edu
>> <mailto:lr at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Scott Battaglia wrote:
>> >
>> > If that's not possible, is it possible to configure a second
>> > instance of
>> > the CAS server mounted at a different URL that shares the
>> same ticket
>> > store as the first server? That way I could point Google
>> Apps to that
>> > second instance, and keep existing applications pointed at
>> the first
>> > instance.
>> >
>> > CAS can share ticket stores. We've got a few options including
>> > JBossCache, MemCache, and Terracotta. The last two will be
>> as of 3.3.
>>
>> Does this means that if I were to try Terracotta with CAS 3.2.x, I
>> would be beating my head against the wall?
>>
>> -lucas
More information about the cas
mailing list