"Lab" timeout different than "Office" timeout?

[Scott Battaglia]

And no need for a custom resolver unless you are doing more stuff than just
returning the username.
-Scott

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Scott Battaglia <scott.battaglia at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Tim,
>
> You can set the Credentials class on the AuthenticationViaForm action.
> You'll need to set the formObjectClass and the formObjectName properties
> (you should be able to just set formObjectName to "credentials").
>
> -Scott
>
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Tim Mc Laughlin <Tim.McLaughlin at wwu.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Beautiful.  Makes perfect sense, now that I know where to look.
>>
>> I'm also making a CredentialsToPrincipalResolver to make use of the new
>> Credentials
>> subclass.  Did I need to do that?  Can't find a place in the
>> xml/properties files to tell
>> it which Credentials class to use, just the Resolver.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Tim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu [mailto:cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Scott
>> Battaglia
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:55 PM
>> To: Yale CAS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: "Lab" timeout different than "Office" timeout?
>>
>> Tim,
>>
>> You should extend the UsernamePasswordCredentials to accept your new
>> property.  Then
>> create a MetaDataPopulator to take that property and dump it into the
>> attributes for the
>> Authentication object.  Configure that all using the Spring magic ;-)  And
>> then your
>> custom ticket expiration policy will have the value.
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Tim Mc Laughlin <Tim.McLaughlin at wwu.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>        OK, spoke too soon.
>>
>>        The difference between what I'm trying to do and what Trenton Adams
>> wanted is that
>> I'd
>>        like to be able to have the user select which role they're in, via
>> a checkbox on
>> the login
>>        form.
>>
>>        I've located where and how to implement a new
>> TicketExpirationPolicy, but I'm not
>> sure how
>>        to let the value of the checkbox flow through to that code.  Is
>> that possible
>> without
>>        changing core code?  I'd like to stick to recognized extension
>> points only.
>>
>>        Thanks,
>>
>>        Tim
>>
>>        -----Original Message-----
>>        From: cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu [mailto:
>> cas-bounces at tp.its.yale.edu] On Behalf
>> Of Tim Mc
>>        Laughlin
>>        Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:55 AM
>>        To: cas at tp.its.yale.edu
>>        Subject: "Lab" timeout different than "Office" timeout?
>>
>>        I am almost sure I've seen this question fly across the list, but
>> none of my
>> queries have
>>        been right to find it in the archives, so apologies in advance.
>>
>>        I've been asked if we can implement variable timeouts based on
>> role, the most
>>        straightfoward of which will be a checkbox on the login form that
>> can be checked
>> if you're
>>        on a "Lab" or "Public" computer.  Checking this would result in a
>> shorter CAS
>> timeout than
>>        an "Office" or "Private" computer.
>>
>>        Can someone point me in the right direction?
>>
>>        Thanks,
>>        Tim
>>
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        Yale CAS mailing list
>>        cas at tp.its.yale.edu
>>        http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Scott Battaglia
>> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Yale CAS mailing list
>> cas at tp.its.yale.edu
>> http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Scott Battaglia
> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>



-- 
-Scott Battaglia
PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://tp.its.yale.edu/pipermail/cas/attachments/20080528/8bb607f1/attachment-0001.html